class warfare

Human Activity Displayed in Zoo

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Zoos are great for studying animal behavior.  The beings who live there watch the show.  A scheme overcharging some to make entrance free for others means it’s not those behind fences getting scrutinized.  Recognize behavioral patterns such as never recognizing behavioral patterns.  Those allegedly on exhibit look outward and wonder what those gawky upright creatures are thinking.

Neither workers nor furry friends are being treated like good neighbors.  The Buffalo Zoo provides an inadvertent look at failing to grasp outcomes.  Their program creating complimentary admission sounds nice until realizing the price hike is paid for by those who, well, pay for tickets.  A benefits card also doubles as a zoo pass if you fretted the definition hadn’t been stretched enough.

Why spend on anything?  Free is much cheaper.  There can’t possibly be a catch.  That little bit about how anything is funded is an avaricious conspiracy promoted by heartless capitalists who insist upon payment for provided goods.  Have the compassionate courage to think something can be made to cost as much as shoplifting.  It just takes enough faith to defy sense.

I hate to bust up the fun of seeing giraffes’ antics gratis, but a wealth transfer isn’t going to ease the process.  Charging more for admittance means more money unless fewer prospective visitors hit the turnstiles.  Thinking incentives exist is a bunch of free-market mumbo jumbo.  At least, it better be.

A ripoff spurs smirking amongst accomplices.  Spot them on campaign signs.  The newest type of entitlement means it’s time for a particularly smug style of self-righteousness from sanctimonious politicians who are for some reason involved in decisions regarding an animal enclosure.  If it’s run as poorly as government, the zoo’s dwellers are in trouble.

People who think you’re not generous enough are preening about how indigent children will finally be able to see a zebra in person.  In prototypical governmental fashion, those with collective urges make it more difficult for whippersnappers with parents who pay bills.

Getting punished for paying sums up human conduct.  Scientists observing patterns shake their heads at endless tiresome patterns.  Making just enough over the poverty line means punishment, so don’t knock yourself out working for some promotion.

Can you afford to see other species?  Entering the Buffalo Zoo will run an adult who makes too much money 30 dollars.  It’ll be over a hundred bucks for a family of four, which is a steep price even in the Bidenomics era.  Hungry otters shouldn’t have to deal with shrinkflation.

It took me a whole seven seconds, but I came up with a way to help children see animals other than squirrels.  Start with a lower ticket price.  Offer patrons the chance to donate to an admission stockpile for the less fortunate. There: voluntary help keeps the beast park accessible instead of ironically putting attendance out of reach.

Animals are on the dole.  It’s not their fault.  Like just about every other area institution, the zoo is already subsidized by taxpayers.  The refusal to distinguish between what’s worthwhile and whether involuntary contributions should be used for support is liberalism’s core.

If you really enjoy a cultural institution, feel free to give freely.  You certainly wouldn’t make an enriching shed’s future precarious by draining the economy so messianic dolts who won elections can decide who’s worthy of bestowment.

A zoo simply couldn’t start a GoFundMe for expenses: the monkeys would spend gifts on toy cars and chicken fingers.  Forget cutting out the middle monkey.  The only option is apparently to drive up costs for suckers who work hard enough to not qualify for handouts.

Guilt is the government’s main currency.  A one for the price of two deal may seem like a bit of a ripoff.  But that’s only because you don’t care about ramen consumers.  The problem is that everyone’s eating college snacks for dinner.

Democrats love the underprivileged so much that they they create more of them.  Givers away of money belonging to others can’t figure out why things like a zoo trip are unaffordable.  It must be corporate greed.

Eggs are a luxury.  Forget seeing animals frolic regardless of whether or not they hatch.  Prices have run amok like a stampeding buffalo herd because of the same sort of mentality that concludes you can create a benefit through compulsion.  Every single maneuver to make things inexpensive cheapens results.  Oh, and they make things expensive.

Democrats are so compassionate that they have to force donations.  The pushy part refuses to comprehend assisting voluntarily.  They’re capable of conceiving of helping others unlike those residing in the penned exhibits, which means there’s no excuse.  Conditioning to believe daft things is not in one’s nature.

Beings who live more than 10 miles from a Starbucks learn about cause and effect in a harsh way.  Menagerie proprietors are about to discover a similar lesson.  Consequences are more dire in the wild.  But earners are getting eaten alive.

The entry redistribution scheme will work great as long as ticket-buyers keep doing so.  Can the mayor issue an executive order?  The county needs a law compelling wildlife enthusiasts to keep purchasing, which only sounds silly until you realize that wouldn’t be that much different from coercing taxpayers.

Everything works out except for seeing animals.  Zoo goons just made the place unaffordable for paying customers so they can preen about how much they care.  And attendance is about to plummet, which means the program will be nowhere near financed.  A philosophical and practical disaster sums up the beliefs of humans who don’t understand their own intrinsic traits.

Animals aren’t just cuter, funnier, and cooler than most humans: when it comes to those overseeing their displays, they’re more sensible, too.  Zoology allies who aren’t logical about zoos showed a lack of comprehension regarding their society.  Those who have an excuse to not grasp abstract convepts will look at the empty spaces in front of their enclosures and wonder where their pals went.  The difference between zoo residents and liberals is that the former learn.

Oh, That’s Rich

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Contrary to popular belief, there are a few forbidden crimes left in America.  Lying about losing an election is the most prominent one even if there’s no law against it.  Don’t you dare try using a gas stove, felon.  And the most fiendish villains get rich.  Nobody is creating much of anything, and the best hope in this worst scenario is that idleness is by design.  Interdictors of commercial activity didn’t do this by accident, right?

The only present offense is earning.  Commit justice by taking lucre from targeted villains who commit the unforgivable sin of making what people desire.  Fair profiteers copy the government and take.

The presumption that the best thieves become CEOs is an excuse for not working hard.  Avoid a life of criminality by half-assing an entry-level job.  This useless planet contains a finite amount of jewels, so don’t even bother competing to pocket them.  The race to solve the treasure map where those who filled their pockets shoved aside the underprivileged makes us all losers, I say to applause.  Items and services that can be created seem like un unfair advantage for those who are good at things.

Contempt for diabolical humans who offer products others buy voluntarily is how Democrats express their ability to distinguish between right and wrong.  Endless jobs created as a byproduct just mean having to go to work instead of waiting for the glorious dole.  Employment is not the goal in itself, which is evil to liberals.  You’re supposed to provide work as a company’s purpose, not pursue icky profits.  Truly benevolent CEOs would pay poets to write sonnets about butterflies instead of completing some mundanely profitable tasks.

You can shop elsewhere.  Democrats seem confused about their options to the point where they confiscate them from everyone else.  The lack of respect for others who are capable of making decisions must be spread by coercion in that archetypical liberal style.

Conglomerate barons possess the audacity to address needs.  Reality is a cruel capitalist that makes us hand over something for stuff, services, or work.  Choose among many for the ultimate in misery, according to enlightened progressive who want to kindly eliminate all choices but the lousiest.

It’s one thing to have nothing to sell and another to presume nobody else does, either.  A lack of empathy comes naturally to those who feel help must be mandated.  Contempt for anyone paid is a natural side effect.  One can only become that wealthy by thievery, we’re assured regarding stores that seem to attract customers without force.

Scowling at a billionaire while presuming there’s a string of unsolved felonies covered up by paying a small percentage in bribes requires presently unfound evidence.  Deciding based on information runs counter to trusting authorities to offer relief.  This is no time to stop genuflecting to Anthony Fauci.

You can get any product you want on your doorstep within a few hours if traffic’s not bad.  Hoping it’s an Amazon truck and not a post office vehicle provides the only apprehension.  Trying to think of any instance when government has provided something of higher quality quicker than a private entity is unfair, as they still must compete until that icky reality is declared illegal.

The actual villains are rich politicians.  There’s no way to get wealthy honestly as a public servant.  It’s no wonder crime has been decriminalized in an era of being ruled by thieves who use the sheen of legality to grift for our benefit.  Making everyone affluent by communalizing wealth surely requires a finder’s fee.

Demonizers of successful enterprise overseers can’t explain why, say, Nancy Pelosi possesses a fortune that seems beyond what she could have saved on a humble representative’s salary. I’m just jealous.  She’s really amazing at picking stocks that she just happens to oversee.  Her career’s just getting started.  Now’s the time to really let her have power for your protection, if your means their and protection means profit.

As for the CEO of this thriving outfit, Joe Biden is the prototypical grifter if you don’t believe he’s capable of serving as an example.  Overreaching to use ensuing power for personal enrichment is the hobby of public warriors who keep you safe from life’s vagaries.  The embodiment of selfless responsibility just happens to include domain over you and everything you might want to decide.

Politicians should be sharing efficiency apartments.  Arguing about when the Murphy bed should be deployed would be a fitting use of debate skills.  Guilting you for not surrendering more treasure to be frittered buying votes would be dropped to the bottom of their priority list as a bonus.

Accusing others of what they do isn’t merely the lamest distraction ever: the simpleton’s technique also informs all of Democratic policy.  Everyone else is as fecklessly reckless, right?  Legal distrust of entrepreneurs who meet the needs of others is the same reason they don’t trust others with guns, presume donating freely to charity is a foreign notion, and can only pile up cash upon maneuvering oneself into a position of public trust.

The baked-in notion that wealth is created by government and greedily hoarded by ruthless industrialists is compensation for uselessness.  Conducting struggle sessions for those who profit through mutual free will has created as much productivity as anticipated.  Very consistent thinkers who think of employment and purchasing as exploitation are busy mercifully redistributing what they deem parceled incorrectly.  Statist henchmen figure you can’t perform any complicated task like choosing or spending.

You can’t dissent, of course, as our very survival depends upon cooperation.  Autonomy would mean using money willingly, which would drive our poor government out of business.  A process that demotivates everyone involved will finally allow us to prosper without working.  Pesky independent humans are fools to decide otherwise.

Class Warfare Saboteurs

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Liberalism helps those who are already rich.  That’s nice work unless self-appointed defenders of the downtrodden had a different goal.  Monocle aficionados appreciate politicians doing their bidding.  The underprivileged shouldn’t feel as enthusiastic.  Now, there’s a class war.

Aiding those who need it least is especially cruel when oafs explicitly state they’re pursuing the opposite.  I wish to avoid being a partisan and note outcomes turned out precisely how they said they wouldn’t.  But I’ll pursue amity some other time.  For now, Democrats keep inflicting what they vow they won’t just like always.

Nothing embodies the liberal ideology like helping their enemies.  Gun crime thrives when guns are blamed for crime.  The environment is presently suffering while smug fans of not learning how the outlet works insist upon powering cars with coal.  And the principle of governmental spending to allow people to do the same does just that except for having nothing left over after funding frittering in the first place.  Draining the economy to fill it has the same effect as sending power plants into overdrive in order to power very green cars.

Liberals are double agents in class warfare.  They’re cool undercover spies without realizing it.  Don’t presume James Bond’s gender.  Inadvertently aiding the other side is how they contribute.  It’s not like society’s amateur designers are going to start successful enterprises.  Serving as bad examples will have to suffice.

The noblest signalers would sell their principles in moments.  They think everyone else is just as calculating as they are, which is why they preen about their selflessness as overcompensation.  It’s at least easy to understand why such remarkably generous people demand to make charity mandatory.

I hate to alarm fans of the real New York City, but another faceless condo just replaced a bodega.  There’ll be another demolition by paragraph’s end.  Wondering where people are supposed to shop and eat is for right-wing capitalists who have no place.  Warehousing humans in pods is even more dystopian than the most imaginatively depressing science fiction.  Pete Townshend predicted the future.  I’m looking for that one block with a bank, Starbucks, and drugstore.  

A reduction of profits will surely motivate workers to toil harder.  Think of the collective, you selfish brute.  Now give more of what you’re decadently awarded to layabouts.  The next trash clearance will be the one that makes government clean.  Democrats would make a law limiting passing along costs before wondering how anyone could’ve possibly evaded such a restriction for fairness.

Punishments apply to all.  This isn’t the criminal justice system we’re discussing where deliberately unpleasant sentences only affect those defending against barbarians.  An emaciated economy leaves everyone hungry.  Dragging down those already at the bottom is a philosophy that some insist helps, which is as mysterious as wondering why anyone is surprised inflation suddenly became such a fad.

Universally harmful impositions are simultaneously unfair, which is one of those tricky outcomes like why removing competition fails to inspire productivity.  The rich can withstand whatever they can’t evade.  Meanwhile, alleged beneficiaries of liberalism cannot escape.  Proles are stuck with even smaller pittances.  Joe Biden and his flunkies claim the poor can’t get ahead then ensure that’s precisely what happens.  A self-fulfilling prophecy achieved by gaming the system is something they claim to oppose.

Policies that the rich can manipulate are great if your goal is to reinforce stratification.  Like valueless currency and the contemporary plague, a caste system is yet another recent shocking retro development that we can only hope was unforeseen.  Take how real estate barons are contributing to Eric Adams as he makes the city unsafe for their clients in what are totally not bribes to get cushy deals.  Capitalist’s foes bitch about beloved Chinese restaurants turning into rubble piles when they keep selecting the wrong number.

Casting themselves as fighters is merely the most obnoxious way liberals warp perception.  They are battling a cause, but naturally not in the way they figured.  Collateral damage is the only type they inflict.  Please stop aiming like that.  Democrats couldn’t cause more damage against the nation and their ideology if that was their goal, and Barack Obama resides in semi-seclusion now.  It’s easier to cause havoc against one’s own side.  Why doesn’t every combatant do so?  Toxic fighters aren’t smart like woke warriors.

Presuming the other side is for rich jerks is one of the open-minded ways Democrats wrongly presume what the other side holds.  True fans of fairness are actually for indifference.  Letting humans interact freely whether they’re trading merchandise, skills, labor, or currency while paying the same rate lets people succeed on their merits, which creates more of it.  That’s unless one doesn’t trust fellow humans, which explains the enthusiasm of oppression.

Not bothering people offends the particular ones who presume they know better.  Framing, say, a flat tax as a handout to conglomerate owners is particularly egregious for a policy that’d merely get government out of the business of punishing for the crime of succeeding.  Imposing regressive policies that harm the lowest earners the most is how Democrats help.  You may have also noticed crime spikes by uncanny chance wherever they impose gun control.  They’re excelling if the innocent deserve punishment.

Taxing Piousness

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Seeing money wasted after it’s impounded is the purest expression of love.  Tax sanctimony involves Democrats not putting money where their mouths are.  Particularly showy phonies claim they’re glad to pay without revealing what else they claimed.  A rather blatant personal distraction goes beyond feeling guilty about not having earned what’s possessed and into thinking everyone else grifts, too.

Helpless helpers never reveal how much they give to their favorite organization.  But it is revealing.  The difference between choice and force sums up the two basic ways to look at everything.  One side doesn’t want to let you make it.  Confiscating decisions applies to everything but abortion.  Tolerant Democrats permit throwing the inconvenient in dumpsters as an expression of autonomy.

Forget learning how many deductions the federal Leviathan’s biggest fans make.  It should be zero, of course, as every dollar selfishly retained as if humans are allowed to keep what they earned keeps an emaciated government from proper nourishment.  Asking for the IRS PayPal username so they can schedule regular voluntary donations is presumably the pending step.

Pushy government fans won’t help voluntarily as part of their commitment to our species.  Caring about something enough to give without prompting is kind of the whole point.  Obligation negates any alleged altruistic motives.  Giving credit to the collective means no individuals had to do anything, which is actually a pretty good encapsulation of the Democratic platform.

Decent causes shouldn’t need binding enrollment.  Those who raise the sign disregard it.  That’s the wrong kind of example regarding a natural reaction.  Any doubts about a program getting subsidies gently wrested from taxpayers are framed as cruel, so stop asking questions about where your money goes.  You have some nerve thinking it was yours, by the way.  Stop writing suggestions on currency.

There’s a pretty simple way around this, which is to not get self-righteous about letting a president decide which organizations deserve how much funding.  Have you seen who we elect?

Check each step.  Helping would easier if we didn’t have so much sapped to allegedly do the same.  Just bill rich people, who are defined as anyone making more than you.  It’s not like they’d buy and invest, which totally wouldn’t in turn spur economic activity.’’

Those who claim they’re pleased to be coerced create a fascinating debate about whether they’re liars or lunatics.  Nobody wins the argument.  Bossing is a way of life, which is unfortunate from loathers of commerce.  They don’t care for commands involving freely joining a company.

You may recall the rather unscientific pushiness as part of a trend.  Pretending that shrieking at supermarket patrons who broke the six-feet buffer zone embodied communal bravery summed up the bullying view of life.  You weren’t even supposed to be shopping, so consider yourself lucky to be harangued.  Begging politicians to rescind rights so basic that they’re not even amendments is one way to violate.

There are better approaches to usefulness than creating the problems they address.  At least they don’t solve them.  The sanctimonious dedication to inflicting abysmal health care by mandate would constitute animal cruelty if inflicted within a veterinarian’s office.

Lousy coverage is pricey.  The very thing that makes it costly is presented as the cure.  You don’t get a choice.  Removing customers from prices invariably increases the latter, which is why nobody will participate on their own.  Democrats call good sense selfishness.

It only seems like a magical cure that prices plunge when people have to pay them.  Competing for business lowers bills instead of pretending that higher taxes is a humanitarian gesture.  The free market makes treatment affordable just like any other commodity.  But then liberals couldn’t make a show of pilfering to compensate for the costs they inflate.

There’s a chance to look up what charity is in the meantime.  Chances are plentiful, what with idleness caused by joining a progressive future with a president in his 80s pimping ideas discredited before his birth.

The self-righteously wrong could take moment away from preening to learn how wretched they were all along.  Compulsory charity filtered through Nancy Pelosi is the precise opposite of compassionate.  Flaunting a show of just how much they assist must certainly be a sure sign of confidence, right?

There’s an easy way to make sure a certain amount of dollars go to specific causes.  Unfortunately, it requires utilizing free will.  Fans of bossiness coincidentally don’t believe in the existence of personal autonomy, what with it meaning humans are responsible for their actions.

It’s not just the effort of clicking a couple links that prevents choosing to assist  Giving personally would be taken from their own personal money, and that’s so expensive.  Billing the hive is way more loving.

Disregard how awful vote-buying suckups decide who gets nourished by seized funds to feed their entirely baseless messianic complexes, not to mention untold trillions commandeered from earners that could be given or create enough prosperity to prevent the need in the first place.

It’s surely someone else who’s had his unjust fortune plundered and deserves it for receiving an above-average salary.  Helping is awesome when we do together, so let’s make everyone participate.  Members of a particular very compassionate ideology claim everyone else needs to be ordered.

Legally Jealous

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Life is mean. The series of events we endure while existing features various cruelties that don’t respond to pleas for deserved mercy.  Worst of all, some of us have nicer stuff than others.  But coping apparently isn’t an option.

The lamentably prevailing unwillingness to focus on one’s own situation has become a scenario everyone must face.  Communal policies drag down the rest of us.  Professional pouters who’ve decided existence is a ripoff have turned toddler supermarket tantrums into a political philosophy.  You can’t just shop in a different aisle to minimize shrieking.  The shelves are just as empty, anyway.

Ensuing policy doesn’t stop tears.  Inflicting conspiratorial bitching on everyone else by law only spreads misery.  But suffering is only assuaged by making others feel it, too.  Empathy isn’t as effective when it’s merely figurative.

The second word of student loans should be a giveaway.  But some undergrads seem to major in not learning definitions.  In fact, woeful graduates leave campus determined to make up what terms mean.  It’s little wonder they deem diplomas so useless that they should be complimentary.  On one hand, art history majors signed a contract to repay money they borrowed.  On the other, it’s just not fair.  How are you supposed to pay bills when you have bills to pay?

Presuming present tax rates are the default comes naturally for those who treat Washington as Mecca.  Sacred proclamations from elected prophets cannot be disputed.  Blasphemers possess the damnable audacity to suggest earners should keep what they earn.  But currency holders buying what they wish with what they’ve been given could lead to frightening unplanned prosperity.  Joe Biden wouldn’t even be regulating happiness.  He’d manage to end its existence.

The dream of seizing more somehow fails to inspire boom times.  Framing a slight reduction of piracy as something that needs to be paid for is particularly galling when it’s actually government that must justify every expenditure.  Free people sure do have to pay for a lot of crummy goods.

I remain grateful I don’t fume like liberals regarding the notion that people who earn the most should be able to keep slightly more.  Using fuming positively might create a functioning business.  But it’s easier to presume conglomerates will profit eternally despite incessant confiscation.  Democrats who rely on taxing endless profits make profiting taxing.

The dire practical effects of their daft philosophical lunacy shock those who inhabit an entirely theoretical world.  The refusal to engage with the actuality creates grudges.  Even worse, the unstylish crabs enforce their contempt upon the kind and gracious.

Government must assist those it wronged.  The behemoth of coercion has to take in order to help victims of an economy that perpetually struggles for mysterious reasons.  I wish there were a way for people to take what they’ve received from others in exchange for providing goods or services to use what they’ve earned to keep the financial setup going.

There has been some rumbling about the existence of an alleged free market.  But how can we be certain this so-called invisible hand exists?  Nobody can see it, duh.  Some right-wing kooks with their silly insistence on not bothering everyone else theorize that wealthy fiends spending or investing spurs joy far more efficiently than envy.  A yacht big enough to store their other yachts keeps factory schlubs working.  But someone in the world might be earning more, which simply cannot stand.

Jealousy is the only skill which the useless develop.  It’s not exactly valuable unless you get elected to Congress.  The lack of productivity causes even more resentment, and the cycle doesn’t ever hit rock bottom.

It’s bad enough to believe such and even worse to enforce such.  There’s a reason liberal policies are based in mandatory participation.  You can’t just choose to plunder what successful people have accumulated unless you get the force of law on your side.  Class warfare warriors rot from believing life is engineered by sinister forces to keep everyone but you personally from thriving.  Government takes the perversion out of ridiculous fantasies.  Some sickos need legal permission.

Oozing government always results in initiators sabotaging bystanders.  There are better ways to achieve equality.  Enthusiastic adherents loathe individual credit for good reason.  An outlook that figures oppression is the default setting is bound to not only perceive reality fairly but be kind about it.

You won’t be left alone as a matter of policy.  All decent adults want is space to themselves.  But you can’t just have your own stuff and autonomy.  Keeping what you’ve been given by others during free trades epitomizes cruelty.  The mature merely seek the glorious indifference of allowing humans to interact.

Doing nothing is politically unhip.  The harassed eagerly await freedom to come back into vogue.  The one thing worse than living with such bitterness is diluting the sweetness of others.  Very cheery optimists who decided there’s no hope of improving do their best to convince others of the same.  Persuading an employer to take a chance takes way too much effort, and you haven’t even reached the first day.

Story Sobs

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Making people cry is a Democratic specialty.  They’re not as good at it when they try.  Sob stories beat considering outcomes.  Don’t you care about feelings?  The stubborn refusal to calmly notice consequences is brought you by the same people who thought names like the Inflation Reduction Act and Affordable Care Act would actualize their concepts.  Empathy junkies can’t rely on something as tricky as results.

Condemnation of foes gets quite screechy.  The selective basis of allegedly caring is even more irksome for those who turn vicious while oh so fairly categorizing issues they oppose.  Sneer stories about those suffering the onerous burdens of their regrettable policies indicates faking, which is only the start of trauma.

Pirates seizing booty at will claim they’re only packing treasure chests to buy formula for babies with parrots on their shoulders.  Contemporary land-based marauders are not charming rapscallions like Johnny Depp led us to believe.  That’s surely the only time Disney warped reality.

Wholly compassionate liberals sure do express a lot of concern for criminals.  Police and an ambulance arrive infinitely faster than sympathy.  Victims will have to wait way longer than they will for assistance in thwarting attackers.  The former can afford cash bail after seizing wallets from the latter, but they don’t have to endure the dignity of posting it.

Criminal coconspirators defend muggers by bringing up starving families desiring a bit of bread.  Poor societal victims can barely swipe protein.  Never mind that people can’t afford extravagances like carbohydrates thanks to Joe Biden thinking taking money from the successful while printing extra will make everyone rich.  The rather active process of seizing what belongs to others may harm those liberals refuse to classify as victims.  It’s not the first time they refuse to acknowledge proper definitions.

Jail is not fun.  It’s true!  Even if you’ve not caused enough mayhem to visit one personally, our capacity for understanding the experiences of others indicates physical containment would be unpleasant.  And it’s tough to get respectable employment after learning to do time as opposed to letting the time do you.  But I wonder if there’s a reason inmates arrived there that doesn’t involve the capricious cruelty of randomly assigning a percentage of particularly unlucky humans there.  Apologists for convicts never share any sympathy for those who’ve suffered from their transgressions.

Ripping off lenders is a less violent but just as shameless crime.  Rousing the force of government is necessary for those who don’t trust humans to help each other through trade or charity.  It’s no coincidence those who adore wielding quasi-legal power to plunder oppose the Second Amendment.

Underwhelming college diploma-holders who took loans can’t pay them, and naturally taxpayers are to blame.  Borrowing in the first place seems to be the start of the whole cause and effect thing.  Anyone truly ticked about the repayment of exorbitant amounts should notice tuition became even more expensive than gasoline when Washington started throwing cash at colleges.  Class warfare guerrilla fighters who think all CEOs are criminals sure don’t seem to care about an innately predatory government.

Meanwhile, the eternal liberal obsession with confiscating income isn’t going to stop at something trifling like death.  Sneering at families passing down what’s earned is how to show the government is the eternal boss.  Spending a lifetime working to improve life for descendants must be punished.

Pushy tax policy concludes that passing along success leads to loafing to the point where they can use federal power preemptively.  Working hard so children can have a good start gets politicians out of deciding who benefits, which is simply unacceptable.  What next: will there be a policy that doesn’t treat children as federal assets?

At least kids ripped off by the government got to be born.  When it comes to weeping justification versus fuming demonization, abortion combines both.  Liberals suddenly love efficiency.  Debtors are not mature enough to pay for a degree but adult enough to decide which babies don’t get to win the living lottery.

Tales of woe somehow don’t get applied to those who haven’t yet gotten the chance to emerge.  Disregarding that the overwhelming percentage of abortions are for retroactive birth control is crucial to the effort to complain that men just want to boss around the nicer gender.  Mansplaining that there’s a life in question is for chauvinist brutes.

Be an ally via trying to score by bragging about how cool it is that women control their bodies.  Abortion definitely exerts control over the bodies growing within.  The most pious of the political don’t shed tears for those particularly innocent sufferers.

Don’t you care about not helping others?  Guilting people into vaccines they have noticed are less effective than a flu shot is the most prominent longterm symptom of replying to the virus.  It’s even more worrying than shortness of breath.  A whole shutdown based on shaming everyone into thinking they presented imminent peril to everyone else shattered society while not stopping the spread.  But it succeeded other than that.  Noticing masks don’t work embodies cruelty.

Making everyone feel bad is the end result no matter the form of lousy portrayal.  Democrats need some form of emotional manipulation in order to make their case on any issue, which you’d think might offer a sign.

The sadness of those who they deem oppressed or fury at those they haven’t successfully been able to do so defines their efforts.  Fiction fans refuse to tell honest narratives.  Subtractors of value act like successful entrepreneurs are exploitative as they give themselves extra counterproductive work.

Impoverished Wealth Gap

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

The chasm between rich and poor is growing like the economy isn’t.  Static people can’t move between strata, which offers blessed relief from the chaos of social mobility.  Calcification prevents the upheaval caused by customers buying and selling or earners getting ahead.  Isn’t stability a delight?

Problem solvers cause problems.  Class warfare warriors can’t even laugh at themselves.  A gap growing under those dedicated to narrowing it shows just how good they are at everything.  Victims are not as amused as hoped.  It turns out there’s no way to buy groceries with irony.  Acquiring a little money is pointless when bills are worth as much as leaves.

Democrats dedicated to eradicating it exacerbated it.  We’re way past the three examples needed for a trend.  It’s little wonder professional grifters are so suspicious of commerce when they ruin everything they attempt.  The baked-in presumption that entrepreneurs are also inept oafs who can only scheme as a result of an inability to generate anything valuable shows astounding closed-mindedness from the side that can’t stop preening about their own alleged tolerance.

Trying to create equality by making everyone equally poor isn’t as noble as framed by sanctimonious tweets.  Liberals can’t even tear down the rich properly.  Competitors with bribe money are positioned to exploit crooked refs.  The only people presently getting rich are those who already were.  We learned which side loves concentrating wealth.

Liberals getting everything they want should create a showcase home.  Instead, the neighborhood’s too dangerous to get to a dump that would need upgrades to become a crackhouse.

You can’t make it here or anywhere.  New York City is the epicenter of layered living.  The impossibly rich gobbling up floors in blandly soulless residential needles literally tower over the festering proles.  It’s such a lively town.  Oh, and Gem Spa closed.

Pretending that a system rigged to benefit those connected to power would help the unfortunate made The Time Machine nonfictional.  H.G. Wells would be disappointed to reach the present day and discover his dumb ideology was the cause.

Scientists are baffled why places that get everything liberals want turn to hellish.  There’s an awful lot of stealing in places where nobody has anything.  Of course, constant felonies could be the cause.  Frighteningly woeful Blue State cities create a chicken versus the egg situation where both foods are out of reach.  Aspiring to acquire is the only thing they consider to be a crime.  Government thieving began the unfortunate cycle.

Bossy types who have never been bosses simply can’t accept that people might have different incomes.  It seems awfully elitist to believe there are different ability levels.  Trying to drag down those who dare to succeed naturally makes their pet cause even more.  Joe Biden announcing he’s out to cure cancer will somehow make it spread worse than inflation paired with the Taliban.

There’s good news if Democrats wanted distinct income groupings to condemn.  So, that’s why they promote them.  There’s no way to wage class warfare if the wealthy disappear.  And who would be taxed into oblivion to fund federal nonsense?  The money reservoir will surely never evaporate, as acting like the rich have undeserved limitless cash reserves is at the heart of progressive policy.

You’ll never guess who the villains were all along.  This documentary sucks.  The belief that everyone has a shady side concealed in order to connive is the essence of psychological projection.  Democrats reinforce the precise sort of caste system they allegedly loathe.  They claim there’s no way to advance before doing everything they can to prove it.

Accusing others of what central meddlers dubiously achieve makes permanent envy like all their other sad beliefs.  The predictability only surprises them.  Everyone else braces to cope.  Gun crime thrives when liberals get their preferred control, the Legion of Doom struts around the globe after Democrats decide they’ll create peace by acting cool, and printing money makes it less valuable.  Beg them to knock off assistance.

Spreading poverty keeps Democrats in business.  Unfortunately, that means nobody else is.  Draining funds from the economy in order to save it hasn’t quite spurred universal prosperity.  But legal theft compensates for people not knowing what they need.

The model for all future wise presidents figures those who actually had the money won’t spend it correctly, which is why he never bothered to earn an honest buck.  Biden’s merely the most prominent example of his party who decided commandeering funds like Popeye Doyle taking a car to chase a suspect is necessary for public safety.

Making problems worse may as well be their goal.  Dropping napalm on trash fires gives Democrats something to do.  A constant stream of victims help rather meddlesome politicians have new voters to totally not bribe.  Those suffering should know they’re contributing.

Maybe bribes will convince the economy to purr.  Paying voters with funds seized by others is the opposite of commerce.  The only thing worse than handing out cash for favors is not being able to fund it themselves.  If they earned, they wouldn’t be Democrats.

Creating more penury helps the ruling party feel like they’re overflowing with compassion.  Heroes first need a bunch of victims.  Unfortunately for parasites, their prey doesn’t nearly have as much currency stashed in vaults as hoped.  Lousy redistribution pros are running out of wealth to not spread.

Oh, No: Hochul

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Subway shovings have just begun.  New York’s criminals will continue being treated like victims while actual victims will have whatever isn’t stolen taxed away.  Albany commits quasi-legal theft.

Voters in a state that embraces freedom if opening prison gates counts are apparently eager for more targeting.  New York is full of masochists.  Suffering under Joe Biden wasn’t punishment enough.  Federalism sometimes means extra ruinous policies get enacted closer to home.

The erstwhile Empire State can stop creating bad examples for everyone else to avoid.  A progressive hellhole offers a concentrated dose of the flailing bossiness that’s lamentably become a trend in these oh so enlightened times.  There’s a promising update for any state resident who didn’t feel kicked around enough by inflation.  Plundering is New York’s only thriving industry.

Dodging responsibility will remain a popular Democratic hobby.  Warning about those not in power getting their way as their own policies fail is the classic excuse that does everything but improve the state’s fortune.  They just need more of their brilliant ideas enacted, you see.

Kathy Hochul’s strategy of chasing away anyone who wouldn’t vote for her was the wisest strategy she’s ever pursued.  That had to have been her plan, right?  I wish there could be an easy way to tell what approach is successful like seeing if Blue States lose population to Florida and Texas.  Unlike the miserably grabby way Democrats see the economy, electoral votes are a zero-sum game.

A liberal economy sure is illiberal.  The prototypical tax and spend hive is running out of prey.  I’m sure they’ll attract more successful people who are eager for a pilfering.  Seeing humans the way vampires do is a sure sign politicians respect liberty.  What We Do in the Shadows is a fake documentary about the real scenario of people who gladly enable those who exploit them.  Presuming money earned by taxpayers is hers compensates for Hochul’s thorough lack of personal productivity.  Elect those who know how to spend better than you do.  

Being locked in the state with seething fiends is not as compassionate as billed.  Acting as if posting bail is a crime has allowed actual offenses to increase exponentially.  The parodic take on liberal policies is all too real.

Hochul may as well blame a microphone for the moronic things she spews.  New York is in for another term of blaming guns for crime as criminals disregard gun control.  The state’s restrictions on a constitutional and human right are strict enough to classify them as provincial.  You can be neighborly to Canada without adopting their refusal to trust citizens with basic liberties as your house policy.

The governor has made it virtually impossible for those who obey laws to arm themselves.  Meanwhile, felons who are willing to commit one more will have no problem with paperwork.  She really cares for certain people within the state.

The worst thing about the return to lawlessness is having the precedent of knowing how bad it was and avoidable it is.  We don’t even get authentic ‘70s grit out of the worst throwback possible.  The primitive 2020s will apparently be spent perceiving everyone but lawbreakers as lawbreakers.  Concluding that those arrested have been violated while scoffing at the mugged like their wounds and missing wallets are a conspiracy is how Hochul flaunts compassion.

The only New Yorkers not endangered by crime are killed before being born.  Nobody fretting about ridding themselves of babies at will had to worry, as Hochul is dedicated to preserving the option to discard those in wombs when she’s not preening about how the NRA causes kids to be murdered.  Abortion was a winning issue this week for Democrats just like slavery in the 1850s.

How will your money be spent?  Enough participants within the jurisdiction in question voted away the right to decide.  New York’s particularly odious capital makes corrupt cabals look like benevolent republics by comparison.  Funneling any results of prosperity through arrogant elected idiots means the state is like the mob, only unprofitable.  Those who keep voting for the same miserable predation think it’s the only way politics happens as they reinforce the calcified arrangement.

Unfortunate election lessons are the only benefit.  Jeffrey Dahmer could win because his name stars with a D.  While he’s deceased, he has name recognition from a recent fictional portrayal that could land him on a ballot.  Sticking with harm shows once again that Democrats will vote for their party no matter what.  Trivial matters like consequences and suffering will not deter those who think the party of Hochul helps compassionately despite ho3 rust is winning the war.

Supremely delusional backers who elected an incumbent for the first time display a dedicated refusal to check results can’t be considered steadfast.  It’s no wonder Democrats hate free markets when they reward failure.

As for the man who couldn’t beat a documented failure, Lee Zeldin offers evidence that anyone who has ever smiled at Donald Trump will be unable to contend.  Anyone paying attention to the emptiness behind the chintzy gold could’ve told you those aligned were making a deal with a rather obnoxious devil.  Trump’s going to be much less clever about not honoring its terms.  The only thing worse than falling for him then is continuing to do so now.

A Trump pal was the least worst option compared to giving Democrats another chance.  Elections presently suck even more than usual.  Trying to choose the less rotten option has never been less fun.

Sicko New Yorkers re-hired an all-time dolt with impossibly awful record in a job she inherited from an autocratic scumbag who killed off grandparents when he wasn’t treating women like his property.  Andrew Cuomo’s replacement is a slightly different style of scumbag.  Hochul now gets a full term to inflict woe.  Voters saw just how bad life got, had a chance to halt the agony, and chose to reward her.  The sad state of New York demonstrates how liberalism is about making everyone else suffer, too.

Active Regression

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Do something.  It’s the only thing doers get.  The incessantly twitchy don’t seem to care what.  We’ll figure out details later like just what action entails.  Presuming governmental meddling will save us from the horrors of the unknown is intrinsic to sophisticated political theory that disregards the icky Constitution with its archaic implication that people can rely on themselves.  The reassurance that everything will go horribly is comforting in its way.

Never learning makes each day an adventure. The presumption that government is not only equipped to repair but staffed with excellent technicians has been discredited constantly.  Believing it’s possible to find someone serving in it with a swell idea leads to the Joe Biden presidency.

Any experience indicating that vigorous mandated responses to every vagary has ever assisted remains hidden.  If clues did exist, federal researchers would’ve lost the key for the storage locker.

Humans are kept safe by legislation, as long as reality obeys intentions. Those who condemn thoughts and prayers sure love thinking laws that only affect those who obey them have a prayer of helping.

Compassion hookers demonstrate they care by voting for something or other.  Pass some laws then see what they contain, which is a Democratic tradition. Stopping guns from turning sentient works as well as bribing the economy to make everyone rich.

Regrettably active politicians are not about to let ordinary people try anything dangerous like protecting themselves. The innocent then feel guilty about owning powerful murder machines. The only way to keep the law-abiding safe is to infringe, according to those with a pushy interpretation of our Constitution. A belief system based in reading minds makes results worse.  The psychics remain phony.

A lack of imagination defines those whose only solution is surrendering autonomy by new laws. Liberals are unable to conceive of guns being used by decent people.  I would tell them to picture cops, but that would just prompt social justice enthusiasts to scream about repression.  You must be a villain to carry one on a hip, as stopping crime could never work. 

The scary noise and projectile should make you want one.  Good guys carrying them is far more of a deterrent than trying to keep bad guys from doing so.  Those fearful because they don’t grasp incentives are horrified by how powerful they are without realizing that’s exactly why those inclined to freedom adore them.

Forego the possibility of a short downturn into one more consistent. Some virtues can be overrated depending on if megalomaniacal dolts are the ones displaying them. The economy consists of nothing more than trading.  Democrats can’t stand for such unsupervised shenanigans.  Americans are doing as they please without supervision, and ensuing prosperity makes them think authority is invasive.

Figuring the feds can solve the problem of negotiating for labor or purchases make brokenness thorough.  Trying to defeat poverty creates more of it. Those allegedly blessed by assistance can’t appreciate the theory’s practical result.

Make college cheaper than gasoline by subsidizing it even more.  Federal intervention made tuition unaffordable. Naturally, the solution is more of it. Learning the wrong lessons from college leads to irresponsibility paired with defying economics. Not paying is the plagiarism of student loans.

The next irritation won’t be the last in case you thought you weren’t annoyed enough. It’s not as if mandate dealers are upset that their policies didn’t quite live up to guarantees and just want a reset: those eager to skip out on bills bitch about having to pay for services used once the counter starts rolling again.  Past students who were suckers enough to pay their bills learned a lesson after getting a diploma.

Subtle thinkers demand active government no matter what activity entails. Seeing what Washington should encourage glorious lethargy; instead, some curiously demand even more. A test for lunacy is an inadvertent result, which makes it like everything else liberals believe.

The lamest sort of ideology presumes any bill that becomes law will save us from the ghastly variances of everyday life. Inflicting more agony keeps them busy in the worst sort of self-perpetuating way.

Constant kvetching is the perversely logical accompaniment of expecting politicians to fix every concern.  Dashing modern humans can’t work through anything, at least according to those who want us to vote for them to do everything.  If you hate the notion, the reality will really please you.

Self-appointed fixers inevitably make life worse by intervening. The alleged solution is the cause. There’s no time to rue irony when you have to hitchhike in front of the few motorists who can swing fuel.  And there’s no reason to work for a raise when you can get a raise for pretending to do so.  The money’s not worth it.

Please stand still. A country based on the notion that we can work out problems could use an idling government. Americans cope with the ghastly practical effect of deciding the Constitution doesn’t say what they want it to say.

Refusing to trust humans leads to quite untrustworthy conditions. Meddling won’t help, we note for the billionth time. Being sick of the routine is better than being surprised by another attempt to alleviate difficulties that exacerbates them.  Professional interferers will of course demand another something after this one craters.  Keep sinking to eventually break through.

Crime Blame Time

Posted on by Anthony Bialy

Everyone’s responsible except those responsible. Blame for crime curiously never extends to the nefarious ghouls who inflict pain on others with intent. Law and order types remain stubbornly unsophisticated enough to place responsibility on criminals. Shrieking at everyone and everything but fiends committing heinous acts robs us of more than our stuff, although lots of that is gone. Thank an ideology where nobody’s ever at fault and all is communal. You’ll still get blamed for promoting alleged repression that made choirboys into felons.

Fiends are lucid enough in wickedness to attack those who are legally constrained from returning fire. Murderers uncannily always strike in areas with heavy gun control. It’s surely coincidental that human predators find some of the few gun-free zones in Texas.

Make sure to complain about policies that either encourage or promote mental illness after endorsing them to at least offer rueful mirth among victims. Solitary confinement was supposed to break your spirit. The past two years could’ve been an experiment to see how much stress citizens could withstand. Breaking us down is supposed to be followed by rebuilding us. But government’s in charge of construction if you wonder how pieces that don’t fit got crammed there.

Seething perpetrators apparently need to fly red flags higher. The deranged flaunt signs every time. Displaying exactly what those who think Minority Report was a documentary claim will halt mayhem preemptively just adds frustration to carnage. Families should be first responders when it comes to spotting concerning behavior. But that’s just another task passed along to an incompetent government that’ll seize rights in response to its failures.

Those very deeply concerned about the innocent are not going to inconvenience criminals. The real victims are those who harm others because society is oppressive. Jeff Bezos made fortunes at the expense of the downtrodden who he lured into buying affordable goods they wanted, which makes muggings payback. Eliminating the unjust indignity of needing to find cash for bail preserves the presumption of innocence for much longer than we regressively used to find acceptable. How are they supposed to steal that much currency? Everyone’s using cards.

Cities are always dangerous, claim dreadful enablers who turned them back that way. Issuing every excuse for professional hoodlums to prey upon those who committed the crime of enjoying urban life let metropolises revert to hellholes. New York City was once livable, which shocks those whose impressions were permanently shaped by Johnny Carson monologues. To be fair, the time when strolling Gotham’s sidewalks didn’t present significant threat to one’s well-being or wallet was way back during the switch from beepers to flip phones to pocket screens.

Residents who miss riding underground trains without justifiably fearing it could be their last ride don’t even have to be old-timers to bore whippersnappers with tales of keeping phones. A supposedly untamable urban jungle became comfortable no matter the time or block number in part by cracking down on quality of life crimes. Now, turnstile-hopping is treated as a human right, which by sheer chance coincides with subways being ruled by the lawless. Poor criminals engage in fare evasion to buy bread for orphans and not because they steal everything possible, including intangible items like rail journeys.

Liberals hate the effects they cause. The next round of paying people not to be poor should make everyone rich. Similarly, confused types outraged at mass murders while demanding police defunding don’t seem to appreciate we only laugh to cope with the agony they enabled. Classifying looting as righteous leads to more of it. Social justice lunatics grasp incentives in their perverse way.

Lusting after excuses to confiscate rights is a popular hobby for those whose goal is expanding authority. Oh, and they totally care about victims. Like making fuel more costly as policy, the toughest part for those making poor innocent folks cope with liberal policies is pretending a real-life Purge is an unexpected result. It’s normal to feel worse for their victims.

Don’t just do something: stand there. Demanding action of any sort is certainly wise as long as people can never do anything wrong, especially when they’re vainly looking for answers while upset. Lamenting that nothing is ever done presumes alleged solutions are wise or haven’t already failed. Idling beats the something government usually tries, as it inevitably involves hassling the law-abiding.

I agree in a broad sense we need changes. Of course, the fix for legions of villains taking what they wish would entail stopping everything Democrats have done. In this rare case, it’s what they haven’t done. The one time they make government passive is for its actual function of stopping crime. Lax enforcement, prosecution, and sentencing make the party BFFs with criminals. If that sinister alignment wasn’t the intent, they’re even more inept than we thought. Permitting robbing until poverty is rampant is one way to align with the poor. The IRS is nothing more than a racket where muggers wear suits.

Gun restrictions that disarm lawful criminals are about to keep us safe any day now. A party that’s truly skilled at bitching about what they cause blames you for the hideous results of their utterly backward take on safety. It’s little wonder those permitting offenses to flourish oppose accountability as policy.