Rich Kids
Corporations view humans as nothing more than a product to exploit for profit. Now, pay to kill a baby to save money. Abortion is an economic issue to those who understand finances as well as they do morality. They think they’re being complimented. Those who are awful with money flaunt thoroughness by not grasping when life begins, either.
Born children harm the economy according to miscalculating hellions who grasp human nature in every way. The total drag of paying to feed living beings is treated like an annoyance, and not just because a great deal of the purported providers are vegans. Don’t let a life dedicated to a low-protein lack of flavorful joy ruin existence for others. Compassion-mongers who think you’re monstrous if you don’t think the state must fund mealtime. You’ve got some nerve thinking the economy could be good. Who will fund handouts?
Perceiving humans as a burden is a telling view of oneself and others. It’s supposed to be nice to consider others, but it turns out a percentage of us think everyone else weighs us down. Resentment aimed at living children surely inspires them. Remind the horrid brats that they were only born because of a choice if you need to keep them in line.
People will contribute, and not just love, which we’ve been told is priceless. There are profits involved, too. Humans create benefits, which shocks those who treat income as a finite pile of cash randomly assigned to certain lucky hoarders. Pretending the game is fixed is a reason to never play.
As for those who work instead of whining, they trade with each other, which means each offers something. Lives enhanced by what others bring is sort of the whole point. Fans of offing costly children loathe the thought that economics reflects human value.
Rare blessings don’t just fall from the skies despite official White House policy. Any currency you happen to possess is proclaimed to be caused by random chance, which is why Democratic policies lead to a world where misery reigns. Good things seem as rare as they are arbitrary as a self-fulfilling prophecy. A person who cures cancer or invents a car that runs on garbage might be left in a dumpster before even starting life.
Scoffing at every true basic economic decision is popular among those who think sending newborns to dumpsters is even greater than clipping coupons. Prices are lowered by competition. That implies same competitors were carried to term. Performing some activity that others desire enough to pay implies people contribute by nature. Never letting them be born creates poverty in multiple senses.
Seeing infants as parasites is reflected in dreadful economic theories. Think East German, only gloomier. There’s no hope of ever prospering on your own, so begging louder becomes a crucial survival skill. Fate apparently assigned most of the fortunes around, and plunderers made billions, according to very selfless modern views of reality. It never occurs to those with inherently despondent takes on people and money that offering what others desire might lead to greater wealth for both transaction sides.
Lack of alleged guarantees explains why those whose habit of never quite thinking things creates unearned smugness often announce how Republicans care about babies right up until they’re born. The smirk fades upon explaining that there’s nothing compassionate about an endless welfare state. An expectation for taxpayers to subsidize children well through legal adulthood spurs endless immaturity. Treating life as inherently communal conveniently provides another chance to dodge responsibility if they screw up and allow a kid to come into the world.
Oh, yeah: there’s the killing part. Creating economic utopia by letting politicians you wouldn’t trust to feed fish to spend plundered income on projects that never get funded voluntarily for good reason is just about to pay off. I know it deep down. The only thing worse than handing over your money is handing over the notion of when life begins.
Letting a baby get born embodies personal responsibility, which is the bane of their enemies. Unguarded fun may lead to consequences. Reality sure is mean. Abortion at will removes the reason to be careful if anyone’s eager to learn about incentives. I know life isn’t fun, at least not indefinitely, but ending it preemptively isn’t the answer. A baby might also cause happiness if you’re not careful.
Justifying pre-empting life by noting potential hardships and trauma is another way to rail against existence itself. Neglecting to concede that dying before even getting a chance might just be a bit worse is one way to counteract negativity. An unhealthy focus on how life inevitably contains struggles inadvertently expresses their dreadful outlook. It’s only one of the reasons the Supreme Court’s enemies are miserable this time.
An ignorance overlap can’t be coincidental. Those ghoulish enough to only endorse an investment in future savings if it regards abortion won’t scrutinize economic data or a sonogram. Every cartoon depiction of a uterus used to demand men don’t interfere with women’s bodies depicts one that’s empty. Learning about biology, economics, and morality all at once is apparently so overwhelming that there’s no reason to even try.
It’s regrettably easy to grasp why abortion aficionados think those permitted to enter the world create hardship. Anyone born has the capacity to contribute, which shocks those who’ve given up on ever contributing. Personal dedication to ducking hardship leads to presuming people who haven’t even gotten a chance yet will have the same irrational fears. Aspiring professional protesters admit to their own lack of usefulness, which is useful in its way. Psychological projection leading to mass infanticide is a rather grave consequence.
There’s more than money, which I thought liberals cherished. You can love babies the whole time. That shouldn’t be a revelation, but we’ll take one step at a time. Trying to save cash through abortion is inspirationally hopeful in the same way ending life before it begins is empowering. Treasuring life so little because of their own rather significant limitations is an awful thing to inflict on the potentially productive. Let children be born just to see if it works for the best.