On Order
But I thought people would enjoy getting bossed around by the most awful idiots amongst us. The consequences of telling others what to do are disregarded by the tellers. Why should instructors deal with what happens? Avoiding effects of what they create is the whole reason our superiors sought office.
The only problem with our reigning politicians is the entire way they ruin life for everyone else with casual diktats. Nothing is hypocritical like violating your rights by pretending capricious commands carry the weight of legality, so they naturally threw that in, too.
Politicians need the threat of force to implement what must undoubtedly be desirable programs. Meanwhile, professional demonizers call managers at work soulless ogres who dare to only care about profits. What do they dare think companies are for?
The purpose of enterprise is obviously to pay others to live comfortably and not on anything pedestrian like how much value is created; focusing on staying open is so greedy. Those are jobs you’re allowed to quit, by the way. The only thing worse than bossing around is when same bossing makes life crummier.
Customers don’t seem to be enjoying maximum aggravation with a preposterous minimum wage. Nobody can find staff or stuff, but at least these teetering piles of currency are worthless. A lower forced rate would allow for give and take between workers and employers just like occurs with sellers and buyers. Payment would naturally increase from competition. Hey: this market thing works great! But the innately useless demand an absurd rate per hour because they can’t conceive of earning a raise after three weeks of displayed competence.
Potential hires have always been entitled to negotiate, which would be a good sign of entrepreneurial competence. You do the same every time you purchase something, believe it or not. Deciding what’s valuable is a right that’s been revoked by professional life coaches elected so they could dish out what you truly need.
Workers who never get hired in the first place should know how much they’d make if they hadn’t been replaced by cyborgs who expect 15 dollars per hour less. Even the employed can’t afford luxuries like sandwiches, which should assuage those who can’t find worthwhile toil. It’s nice to not feel alone.
Food is a right, then? Announce it in a supermarket or restaurant to see if they’ll let you walk out. You’ll need to eat today but hopefully won’t require health care. Treating something others provide for you as something that must be issued means taking it away is a violation. Keep going. Having to provide something means someone is forced to work. There’s a term for that which has been illegal in America for over a century and a half. Liberals don’t just hate the Constitution for the 13th Amendment.
Getting people to work on behalf of others without coercion is just another step that requires faith in government instead of personal abilities. Health care is indeed a commodity, which horrifies those who think self-righteousness is the strongest cure. Its importance is precisely why it’s best treated as a product. Treating curing like something special without limits is exactly what makes it scarce. The lesson in sanctimony-based economics features quite a bit of agony.
It sure is telling why they need government to enforce tolerance. At least, it would be if the self-righteous realized why they think people can’t be trusted to be as cool as them. Voters who don’t select woke are cruel, claim those who want to exclude fans of free markets from what they amusingly think of as polite society. The same people who are totally loving on their own need a court to tell them discrimination is prohibited. Openminded liberals who’d ban conservatives from their businesses if they knew how to run them think everyone else is intolerant.
Property is treated as communal by those who don’t own it. You may be surprised to learn you’re allowed to do as you wish, including in your place of business. Liberals should try running one before telling others how they must conduct their affairs. They’d suddenly be opposed to pushy unions and unbearable taxes. But the axiomatically invasive don’t expect to endure their own onerous demands.
Deciding what constitutes acceptable behavior is what Democrats presume is their role for every store that doesn’t provide abortions. Decent people can obviously agree that excluding based on personal characteristics is loathsome. So, don’t go anywhere that does so. Would you patronize a place that doesn’t serve based on ethnicity or the gender one dates? I hope not, which makes governmental intervention both invasive and redundant. The free market beats bigotry. Liberals can debate in their own heads whether they don’t trust choice because they doubt others or themselves.
We should be appreciative to share this planet with enlightened humans who know exactly how others should act. Compassion in commands is supposed to create what should already exist. People couldn’t just be nice without legal consequences.
Those who treat the law as a chance to inflict values they think nobody else possesses fail to think out results. That makes it like every other thing they believe. But don’t worry, as self-appointed communal conscience imposers compensate by overpromising on every issue. The thought of life being wonderful will have to suffice when those determined to perfect existence make it miserable.